Written by Cari Borden

A Lewin-inspired modern twist.
Change initiatives don’t fail because employees are stubborn.
They fail because leaders underestimate one thing:
👉 Change is emotional before it is operational.
We talk about strategy, timelines, communications, and KPIs,
but we rarely talk about the fear, loss, identity shifts, ego bruises, and psychological uncertainty that ride shotgun through every transformation effort.
This is the part no one wants to put on a slide deck.
But it’s also the part that decides whether change sticks… or melts the moment the next crisis hits.
Welcome to Lewin’s Change Model, upgraded for 2025.
The Real Barrier to Change Isn’t Process — It’s People’s Emotional Contracts
Every employee has an unwritten contract with the way things “should work.”
This contract is built from experience, safety, predictability, and identity.
Change threatens all four.
So people don’t resist the change itself.
They resist the emotional cost of the change.
That cost sounds like:
- “Will I still be good at my job?”
- “Will this make my leader question me?”
- “Will I lose control?”
- “Am I still valued?”
- “Is this the first step toward outsourcing, layoffs, or restructuring?”
This is the resistance no one talks about because it can’t be solved with a new SOP, a kickoff meeting, or a Gantt chart.
Where Lewin Still Gets It Right (With a 2025 Reality Check)
Kurt Lewin’s classic model—Unfreeze → Change → Refreeze—isn’t outdated.
It’s just under-humanized.
Let’s modernize it.
1. UNFREEZE: The Emotional Detachment Stage No One Names
This isn’t just about “preparing people for change.”
It’s about helping them let go of what was familiar.
If leaders skip this emotional release stage, employees may:
- Nod along but not believe
- Agree publicly but panic privately
- Act compliant while mentally holding onto the old way
- Smile in meetings and resist in silence
Unfreezing requires emotional permission, not just operational instruction.
What employees need here:
- Validation that loss and uncertainty are normal
- Transparency about the why, not just the what
- Acknowledgment of the impact on identity and workflow
- Time to process, question, and challenge without being labeled “resistant”
Leaders who rush this stage create compliant teams, not committed ones.
2. CHANGE: The Messy Middle We Pretend Is Linear
This is the “in-between world” where nothing is stable yet not the old way, not the new way.
Leaders love to treat this stage like a rollout.
Employees experience it like identity limbo.
This is where emotional resistance peaks.
Employees are simultaneously:
- Learning
- Unlearning
- Trying
- Failing
- Performing
- Adjusting
- Worrying
All while maintaining productivity.
No wonder morale dips during transformation.
What employees need here:
- Psychological safety to experiment and fail without punishment
- Micro-changes instead of overwhelming overhaul
- Coaching, not policing
- Leaders who model vulnerability instead of perfection
- Frequent recalibration opportunities
Change sticks when humans feel supported not scrutinized.
3. REFREEZE: The Part Every Company Rushes But Should Slow Down
Leaders love to declare victory too early.
But refreezing isn’t about announcing “We’re done!”
It’s about ensuring new behaviors feel:
- Natural
- Aligned
- Sustainable
- Rewarded
If the new behaviors don’t feel safer, easier, or more empowering than the old system, people will quietly drift back.
What employees need here:
- Reinforcement through rewards, recognition, and shared wins
- Systems and tools that support the new way
- Leaders who stay consistent (not reverting when pressure hits)
- Space to co-create the “new normal,” not just comply with it
Refreezing is about psychological closure the moment the organization collectively exhales and says, “Okay. This feels like us now.”
The Silent Emotional Resistance That Sabotages Change
Let’s name it:
1. Loss of Competence
No one wants to feel suddenly inexperienced.
2. Loss of Control
Uncertainty breeds anxiety.
3. Loss of Identity
People cling to what reflects their strengths.
4. Loss of Predictability
Even imperfect routines feel “safe.”
5. Loss of Trust
If communication is poor, people default to the worst-case scenario.
Change isn’t about process adoption.
It’s about identity evolution and identity evolution is emotional labor.
So Why Doesn’t Change Stick?
Because we treat emotions as obstacles instead of data.
Because we try to “roll out” transformation instead of walk through it with people.
Because leaders underestimate how deeply humans bond to familiarity.
Because we forget that psychological safety is not a “nice to have”, it’s the glue that makes change possible.
If You Want Change to Stick, Lead the Emotion First
People don’t follow plans.
People follow stability.
They follow leaders who can hold ambiguity without rushing or dismissing the discomfort of others.
They follow leaders who understand that emotional resistance is not defiance, it’s a signal that humans care about staying capable, valued, and safe.
If you want to build a culture where change actually lasts:
- Normalize discomfort
- Make invisible fears discussable
- Coach through identity shifts
- Model transparency
- Reinforce progress, not perfection
And most importantly:
Slow down the “freeze.”
Transformation isn’t complete until people feel at home again.
Leave a comment